Loading...
 
Skip to main content

From The Fields

A Libertarian Argentina

FromTheFields Wednesday August 16, 2023


Javier Milei just came in first with over 30% in Argentina's open presidential primary. He's a Libertarian. He's an economist who understands Austrian, free market economics. He did not shy away from controversial libertarian positions. Legalizing drugs. Eliminating the Argentina Central Bank and dollarizing the economy. Slashing government spending and taxes. Reduced restrictions on gun ownership. Even legalization of human organ sales. He is anti-abortion which some libertarians will agree with and some not.

In Argentina the open presidential primary allows voters to vote for anyone in any party. Milei won all the votes in his nascent La Libertad Avanza Party (or Freedom Advances in English). Hardline conservative law and order candidate Patricia Bullrich won the most votes in Argentina's center right party with 28%. The left-wing Peronist party winner was Sergio Massa with 27%.

So it will be Libertarian Milei, Conservative Bullrich and Peronist Massa on the ballot in October. If one candidate does not poll at least 45% or more than 10% over the second place candidate in October, there will be a runoff in November.

The next President of Argentina could very well be a Libertarian. With huge challenges. Inflation is variously estimated at 115% to 140% or more. The value of the Argentine peso on the black market is half the official rate. Unions have a stranglehold on public sector employment. The debt to the International Monetary Fund is a huge $44 billion or nearly $1,000 for every man woman and child in Argentina. The last time dollarization was tried in Argentina, it ultimately failed. If Milei wins, he will have a tiny contingent in the country's legislature. That will make enacting his agenda very difficult. Already, the world's mass media are calling him far-right and comparing him to Trump and Brazil's Bolsonaro.

The left-wing populist Peronists came to power in 1942. With brief interludes of me-to conservative rule, they have been in charge for almost a century. They transformed one of the richest, most productive countries in the world to third-world status. The people may have...finally...had enough.

We send our encouragement and best wishes to Javier Milei and hope that the name of his party, Freedom Advances, is prophetic.

Is Elon Musk subject to the Draft in Ukraine? Is his company?

FromTheFields Wednesday August 9, 2023


Elon Musk is the CEO of SpaceX which operates Starlink, a satellite internet service. Musk has provided Starlink service to Ukraine to stream battlefield video and for intelligence gathering. He has personally refused to let Ukraine use Starlink for offensive purposes. That has included using Starlink to conduct long range offensive strikes, in particular drone strikes against Russian assets in the Black Sea.

Ukraine is understandably upset. Ukrainian Presidential Advisor, Mykhailo Podolyak has said, "The issue is that at critical stages of the war, we desperately need absolute operational and technical independence. That is, the dependence of decision-making and its implementation must be 100%. The risks for our military are too great when the course of offensive operations depends on external circumstances or third parties."

This presents an interesting question. Ukraine is at war with Russia who invaded their country. The United States is not officially at war. But we are providing Ukraine with billions of dollars in arms and assisting with severe financial sanctions against Russia. Starlink is privately owned by Musk. He is under no legal obligation to volunteer use of his privately owned internet service to Ukraine anymore than you are required to give Ukraine your shotgun.

Musk has proposed peace negotiations between Ukraine and Russia. Russia has said they would be willing to talk. The United States government has indicated its willingness to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian.

If any of the news stories about Hunter Biden peddling influence in Ukraine while his father was Vice President are true, there may be some official Ukrainian arm twisting of Joe Biden's arm forthcoming to force Elon Musk to revise his terms of service.

If that happens, know that the richest man in the world is still a tool of the American Empire if the Empire insists on it.

Seigniorage

FromTheFields Wednesday August 2, 2023


Seigniorage, the creation of money to facilitate trade is one of the most important inventions of all time. Reduced to its essence, money is an accounting system which makes it possible to ascertain who owns what and how much of it. To work, money needs to be fungible. It needs to be readily acceptable by sellers of stuff. To be readily acceptable it needs to maintain a modicum of stability of value in relation to stuff. If an apple sells for one dollar today and ten dollars tomorrow, it loses that stability and becomes undesirable as a store of value and a medium of exchange.

But if one dollar buys an apple today and a dollar and two cents buys a similar apple a year from now, that's close enough so that most folks won't notice. Never mind that it means that a dollar loses half its value in about 36 years.

This is called seigniorage. It's why governments and/or bankers have always insisted on having a monopoly on the creation of money and guarding that monopoly with their life. It gives the sovereign, whether it's a king, an emperor, or a government/banking hybrid like the Federal Reserve, the power to create a little extra money for itself. If a king mints gold coins alloyed with 2% base metals and buys stuff for the kingdom as if they were 100% gold, the kingdom gets 2% more stuff. It's effectively an invisible tax on the king's subjects.

Likewise if the Fed increases the number of dollars in existence simply by creating them out of thin air and lending them to the Federal government, it allows said government to buy stuff at a 2% discount.

An honest sovereign or an honest federal government would simply levy a tax yielding the same amount of money as 2% inflation does. But who ever heard of an honest king or an honest government?

The goal of most kings, emperors...and central banks...is to counterfeit, I mean inflate just enough money to make it worth while but not so much that the subjects will notice and look for alternative forms of money. Hence the 2% Fed target. Sometimes governments get greedy and counterfeit like crazy. Think Weimar Germany, Zimbabwe, Venezuela or Argentina. That usually eventually leads to regime change in one form or another. Often not for the better. Think Nazi Germany. It always leads to the eventual downfall of the empire. Think Rome. Or it leads to a change in which empire predominates.

That may be where we are now. Post WWII the United States took over the empire role from Great Britain. The dollar, legally linked to gold replaced the pound as the world's reserve currency, the form of money used to settle balance of payments between countries engaged in trade with one another. When the link to gold was severed by Nixon in 1971, a new link was established by Henry Kissinger. The link was an agreement with Saudi Arabia. If they agreed to price their oil in dollars, we agreed to support their feudal government. We went from a gold standard to a de facto oil standard. It worked well for nearly 50 years. But, as a country, we've gotten greedy, lazy and less productive. We thought it would be cool to trade our counterfeit dollars for Chinese manufactured goods and hollowed out our industrial infrastructure. We bought into the defense industry claims that we needed to spend obscene amounts of money first to fight off commies in the cold war and when that went away, a new enemy, jihadists with box cutters. Next was a flu bug roughly as severe as the 1968 flu which no one remembers. Next enemy, the weather. Meanwhile we bought off those who vote, mostly retired people, with generous socialized medicine and retirement benefits.

Unfortunately for the government, they got a little too greedy and pushed up the inflation tax from 1 or 2% to double digits. Now people who can read the writing on the wall are urgently putting money into gold and cryptocurrencies to protect themselves from the depreciation of their dollars. And it's not just our own citizens. The rest of the world noticed when the Biden administration confiscated reserves from Russia's Central Bank as part of its proxy war in Ukraine. The rest of the world has noticed. Later this month the BRICS, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa are having a little confab in South Africa. On the agenda, a new BRICS currency linked to gold. They have a waiting list of other countries who would like to join. If the United States dollar loses its role as the currency for settling international trade balances, which looks more and more likely, the dollar becomes just another banana republic scrip currency. Barely worth the paper it's printed on.

The end of pax Americana or the American Empire may be coming a little faster than the elites are expecting.

Our Heroes Are Flawed

FromTheFields Wednesday July 26, 2023


The Declaration of Independence was an 18th Century libertarian manifesto if there ever was one. Its author was Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson owned slaves. He made the Louisiana Purchase. Effectively stealing land from Native Americans who had owned and occupied it for centuries by giving a small payment to France. He was a man with flaws.

Ron Paul was probably the most libertarian Congressman ever. He is also an advocate of restrictions on immigration even more draconian than the ones we have now. He has flaws.

And Elon Musk is a free-speech "absolutist". Except when it comes to tweeting the location of his personal jet or giving publicity to his erstwhile competitor, Substack. And a big reason he's the wealthiest man in the world is that he is not averse to SpaceX making sweetheart deals with NASA. Nor is he unwilling to accept government subsidies for Tesla and his solar energy companies. Musk is a flawed human being.

We all are.

And we, as libertarians, are not in power in government. So we should be measured in our criticism of those who do wield power and influence when we have substantial areas of agreement.

When Musk bought Twitter he brought in bona fide ACLU thumping, Goldman Sachs is a vampire squid phrase coining, Matt Taibi to write the story of how Twitter had been colluding with the administrative state to outright censor any news (think Hunter laptop) which could lead to Biden losing his bid for the Presidency. Not to mention outright censorship and suppression of any information, true or not, that contradicted the official administration story, under both Trump and Biden, on anything to do with COVID. Censorship at Twitter under Musk is much reduced to the horror of the censors in the White House and their sycophants in traditional media.

It continues in all the rest of the corporate controlled media; Facebook, Google-owned YouTube, Microsoft-owned LinkedIn, the Bezos-owned Washington Post, the New York Times and many more.It's possible that some of these media companies are honestly in favor of limiting their own free speech. But doubtful. It's an absolute certainty that they are all abjectly terrified at the not so subtle threat that if they do not cooperate with government censorship, they will face new regulations that dramatically reduce their profitability.

They fear the fist in the velvet glove.

Elon Musk does not. For that we must give him credit. He's got a lot to lose. Government contracts for SpaceX and the Boring Company. Loss of subsidies for Tesla. The adulation of the chattering class.

For the sake of the Republic, let's hope he retains that fearlessness.

Free Speech Is Valued More by Those Without Power Than Those Who Have It

FromTheFields Wednesday July 19, 2023


One of the advantages of being alive for a long time (and studying history) is observing politicians change their rhetoric to suit their short term objectives.

I grew up in the 1950s, the McCarthy era. Joe McCarthy, a loudmouthed, rabble-rousing Republican Senator from Wisconsin rose to fame by loudly proclaiming that the State Department and other branches of the administrative state were infested with Russian-influenced Communist sympathizers. Right-wing Republicans took him seriously. Democrats joked that McCarthyites were finding Commies under every bed.

Social conservatives controlled the media: print, movies and TV. Nudity on-screen was verboten. Heck, Laura and Rob in the Dick Van Dyke show and Desi and Lucy in I Love Lucy slept in twin beds.

Birth control, other than abstinence from engaging in sex, was actually illegal.

Liberals advocated for more freedom. The American Civil Liberties Union went to court to increase...civil liberties. The First Amendment freedom of speech and freedom of assembly right for Nazis to march in a Jewish neighborhood in Skokie, Illinois was a case won by the ACLU.

The Free Speech Movement in Berkeley was a massive months-long protest against the Vietnam War demanding an end to restrictions on free speech in protest of the war and other issues.

The Cold War and the origins of the Vietnam War were culturally conservative...the existential struggle of the Capitalistic West against Communism. The Clinton wars in the 90s in the former Yugoslavia were essentially wag-the-dog wars to distract people from paying as much attention to the Clinton sex scandals.But they made war more of a bi-partisan endeavor. The Bush Sr., Bush Jr. and Obama wars in the Middle East were all allowed to happen with support from both Democrats and Republicans. Democrats no longer welcomed anti-war activists.On war, the parties are now unified.

In the 50s and 60s social conservatives controlled the media and were the biggest influence on culture. Liberals were the advocates for free speech.

During the Trump years, Democrats, grasping at straws to counter Trump's effective brand of populism, seized on accusing him of being in bed with the Russians. McCarthyism with party roles reversed. Now Republicans could joke that Democrats were finding a Russian under every bed.

Now that we have a de facto war in Ukraine against Russia that started during the Democratic Biden presidency, the primary anti-war voices are mostly Republican.

In the vacuum of cultural ideals resulting from revulsion to the Vietnam War, the left saw an opportunity and took it. They, over a period of years, gained near complete control of academia and the media. Now that they are in control of culture, they have become the opponents of free speech. Conservatives have become free speech champions.

Only libertarians and classical liberals have been consistently free speech during both eras. We will continue.